Friday, May 25, 2012
Giveaway: Caleb's Crossing by Geraldine Brooks
About the Book: Bethia Mayfield is a restless and curious young woman growing up in Martha's vineyard in the 1660s amid a small band of pioneering English Puritans. At age twelve, she meets Caleb, the young son of a chieftain, and the two forge a secret bond that draws each into the alien world of the other. Bethia's father is a Calvinist minister who seeks to convert the native Wampanoag, and Caleb becomes a prize in the contest between old ways and new, eventually becoming the first Native American graduate of Harvard College. Inspired by a true story and narrated by the irresistible Bethia, Caleb’s Crossing brilliantly captures the triumphs and turmoil of two brave, openhearted spirits who risk everything in a search for knowledge at a time of superstition and ignorance.
GIVEAWAY: I have one paperback copy of this book to give away to a resident of the United States. Just fill out the form below (if you are reading this via email click through to the post and you'll see it) and a winner will be chosen June 1st, 2012 and notified by email.
Posted by
Amy
at
8:19 AM
Labels: Giveaway
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Two Year Anniversary of the End of Lost
I know, I know. To be honest, this could have easily passed me by but a reminder popped up on my tumblr dash and it made me reflect back. Did you know I've only the watched the finale once? I'm thinking about watching it again today to finally give myself that closure, lol.
I was in New York City for Book Expo America when the Lost finale aired. We forced everyone to watch and be quiet or kicked them out of our hotel room. Let's be real, I was probably the most intense about it (Natasha joked she was more excited to watch me watch Lost than the finale itself) but it was still fun. I wish I could link to my thoughts on it at the time, but I never recapped it because that week was so busy! I am one of the fans that loved it, though, I didn't care as much that some of the mysteries were resolved unsatisfactorily because I felt like all the characters were treated with respect. I don't think I've felt quite the same fannish zeal for anything since, but I had a lot of fun watching the show and talking about it and probably heaping it with more love and praise than it deserved.
New York City was decked out for the finale, I stayed at Nicole's for awhile and there was a big billboard right outside her window! But Times Square was also ready. These are my really bad pics taken on my crappy Blackberry.
It was really cool, they had a countdown clock and everything!
LOST may have been an imperfect show, but I loved it for giving me characters with rich stories that I could love, for having so many different ideas--big ideas about the world and life, right and wrong, faith and science, what gives value to our existence --to think about. It gave us six seasons of beautiful music, humor, and gorgeous Hawaiian scenery. This piece at the AV Club that was posted over Christmas about my favorite episode of the show, The Constant, sums up beautifully what LOST was about for me (it's a really great read, please read it!):
But if you had to pick one phrase from the show that established its humanist ethos, look no further than Jack’s line to the still-forming group in Season 1: “If we can’t live together… then we’re going to die alone.” It’s a statement not just about those people, but those at home watching the show as well. A glimpse into The Island’s history is filled with settlers that come and seek to either understand or conquer it. All of them fail, as laid out by The Man In Black. “They come. They fight. They destroy. They corrupt. It always ends the same.” Why do the 815ers succeed where others have failed? They don’t entirely succeed, if one looks at the death toll of the show. But it’s less about how they die and more about how they lived that determines their ultimate fate. Desmond doesn’t make amends with Penny on Christmas Eve in “The Constant”; he reaffirms a connection that always existed. In our best moments, we reaffirm that connection as well.
I still and probably always will miss the show. Nothing else like it has come along. LOST was an ambitious show that gave its audience something to think about and a reason to keep watching, and yet it was wrapped up in commercial appeal. I wish someone would have that kind of vision now.
Did you watch the show? Have you come to peace with the ending? What were your favorite LOST moments?
Posted by
Amy
at
1:02 AM
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Summer Entertainment and Catch Up!
Summer has a decidedly different feel to the entertainment choices. There are lots of explosions and fantastical elements in the movies, people talk about beach reads which one can assume are lighter and more comedic or more juicy and scandalous. TV is next to nonexistent. Oh and there are also lots of outdoor concerts. And when I lived in St. Louis, it was the season for theater because of The Muny, an outdoor theater that I used to go to all the time and where I received most of my musical theater education (as in learned about plays by seeing them not actualfax education). I miss it! (and oh my gosh I just looked at the lineup for this year and it's unfair it's so good! :/ If you live in St. Louis you should go!)
Anyway....I hate summer. It's hot here, and my car is roasting early in the morning. The only thing I semi-like about summers are summer nights when things are cooling down and you can like...feel the release of pressure. I feel some kind of nostalgia during that time for childhood I guess. So my preferred entertainment is probably movies because there's something nice about a cool dark theater and a large icy Diet Coke. But...alas that costs money so I'll try to keep the movies I see to a minimum. I know I want to see Brave, Snow White and the Huntsman, The Dark Knight Rises, The Amazing Spider-Man, Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter (don't judge), and probably more I'm forgetting. I'll probably have to make some tough choices about what to see! What movies are you looking forward to?
But there are also books, and I'm thinking about joining this readalong for The Stand? I usually fail at readalongs, even the ones I host, but this is a book I feel like I might enjoy and also is the kind of book that makes you well read. I want to read the original version, since I've heard it's better, does anyone know if it's easy to find?
Other than that, I actually don't have a lot of books I'm looking forward to. In fact, I'm pretty clueless on what's coming out which is a WONDERFUL feeling. I thought about downloading the sampler of Book Expo America's buzzy books, but part of me likes this "not knowing" feeling. We shall see!
On the reading front, I've been reading Jellicoe Road which I just so happened to pick up. This is a book people are really divided over, like they either think it's beautiful and amazing, or they think it's dull. I have to admit, I thought I would land in the beautiful and amazing camp, but my feelings about the book so far are kind of strange. It was hard for me to wrap my mind around the premise. At the same point in time, there's just enough intrigue that I don't want to stop reading the book. So I don't actually love it, but I don't dislike it either. Maybe my feelings will change by the conclusion?
Also something I've been wanting to mention forever is that I went on to read the next books in the Chaos Walking Trilogy. As you may recall, I appreciated but didn't love The Knife of Never Letting Go but when the chance to see Patrick Ness turned up, I decided to try to finish them. And like....The Ask and the Answer was amazing. I was blown away by how much more invested in the story I became and how much more interesting it was. The Ask and the Answer is a very very interesting book and the entire trilogy is great--it's thinky, emotionally intense, fast moving, etc. And I want to write more about them soon, but I wanted to mention this because it's great when your mind changes about something! And these would be good books for you to read over summer if you can. Also Patrick Ness was really cool and said lots of interesting things and he was really nice and signed all of my books with a different inscription so they'd be special! :)
Lastly...summer TV. I was looking pretty closely at the schedule earlier today and there are some interesting premises for reality shows, like this one on Lifetime about all the women leaving a town that I bet the girls at Lady Business could tear apart with their brilliant minds. But mostly I'll be watching what's tried and true, The Closer (final season, sob), Breaking Bad(first half of the final season!), and HGTV's Design Star while trying some new shows as well. What do you guys watch in the summer? (besides So You Think You Can Dance?)
Speaking of...I watched the pilot for Bunheads today. I think that those of you who watched Gilmore Girls might be interested in this one. The episode itself is packed which makes it feel a bit rushed. And I felt like some of the humor was trying too hard, but even so I liked it enough to want to tune in again. It's a female centric show, which, come to think of it, ABC Family is really good at. The main characters are older than what I usually think of as ABC Family's target demo, but there are some girl dancers that are teens and I'm sure we'll see more of them. The dynamic I felt like was set up at the end of the episode is what largely appeals to me, I can't get into it too much without spoiling it completely (it took me by complete surprise) and so I'm hopeful that it will find its footing and entertain. In short, if you can suspend disbelief--the setup is highly improbable, the show is likely to deliver in emotional truth (at least I hope so) so you should watch! You can check out the pilot early if you want! And then come back and tell me what you thought.
But!!
I still have some things to say about shows that ended last week.
Grimm is one of only two new shows from the season I'm still watching (and somehow I missed a few eps) and I'm not exactly sure why. It's really super goofy and a procedural to boot! But for some reason it's different enough to keep me engaged and I liked the finale quite a bit because it opened up some new storylines for next season. I have a feeling I will always prefer the mythology more than the case of the week stories, but at least people know now that there are mysterious creatures. It was really stretching my believability before! Also, I'm so glad that they added another female character, because that was just pathetic and she's cool.
I'm also still watching Scandal. And I almost didn't finish the season because the show went so over the top so fast. But I'm glad I watched the last two episodes, because I thought they were really great from the standpoint of the Fitz and Olivia relationship. Before the flashback episode I was so annoyed that the show wanted me to root for them. It was an adulterous relationship and I hated the way the reveal was done, where he grabbed her in the office and kissed her. And I hated how he was like, "she's the love of my life" and how Olivia always got conflicted and troubled and doubted herself because of him. But the flashback episode kind of sold me on the idea of them, not so much that I root for them...I think Olivia could do so much better! But the nature of their relationship, how they fell for each other hard and fast, how she pinpointed that the thing wrong with his campaign was how estranged he was from his wife. The actors really sold the moments of longing to touch and be more. But...the moment that killed me was the present day when he showed up at her place and they tried to fix the situation, and before he left he asked for a moment. And she reluctantly curls up next to him and they are both fighting back tears and I could just feel all of those emotions...the hopelessness of their relationship, the pain of the past, the longing for it to be something different than it is. It was a great emotional beat for the show in establishing their relationship and I can completely see why people would ship it or root for it, even though I don't. I think the show takes a shortcut by having his wife be merely ambitious and not really care that he cheats. It protects Olivia and Fitz but also simplifies everything.
But I also loved the progression of it in the next episode. I think it's interesting that they are choosing to paint Fitz as a reluctant president, he desperately wanted to take the out the sex tape provided. But everyone around him is making the decisions and calling the shots and I just thought it was interesting how Olivia and Mellie end up taking his choice away from him by finding a way for him to stay president and how betrayed he felt by that, the supposedly most powerful man in the world. In short, the show is really over the top plot wise, but I don't mind that so much it keeps me engaged. But I also think there are some interesting dynamics in the relationships. Who knows if I'll watch next year, but it was a good diversion this year.
So! Tell me all about your summer plans for entertainment...concerts, TV, movies, books, if I should do that readalong, etc. Also if you are going on vacation!

Thursday, May 17, 2012
Checking In
I am in a story drought. It's not just a reading drought, it's an everything drought. TV this year has been so bad (with a few exceptions) and some of it so so bad that I almost question my defense of TV as a story-telling medium. I haven't been able to get past page 3 of a book for ages, and trust me, I know three pages is not really much time to give a book, but it's like...every book I pick up I question why I thought it was a good idea to read in the first place. Even the movies I've watched lately have been uninspiring. I'm basically pinning ALL OF MY HOPES on Code Name Verity and I'm slightly terrified I won't love it like everyone else, but oh internets, I hope I do since almost all of my favorite bookish people do! I'm just slightly nervous because it's always hard to read a much hyped book when your current state of mind is the fear that you will never love a book ever again.
I'm kind of tired of hearing about The Avengers. I thought it was a fun movie, and I enjoyed it, but I'm sort of amazed at just how much discussion can spring up around it. I mean it's almost baffling! Really serious stuff and more lighthearted fannish glee, but I just can't....like I can't care enough to even think about the movie in those terms at all, it was pure escapist fun. It's making me feel a bit of disconnect with the thinking world around me but also makes me sad because (see above paragraph) I can't remember the last time something just took me by surprise and really excited me in that positive way that made me want to write/think about it. I guess I just feel uninspired.
But wait! There's good news! Beth Kephart is now on Twitter! This is very exciting, because now I can pester her at all times. There are just a few holdouts in my life that I want to get on Twitter.

Posted by
Amy
at
1:28 AM
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
CFBA Book Spotlight: My Stubborn Heart by Becky Wade
Kate Donovan is burned out on work, worn down by her dating relationships, and in need of an adventure. When Kate's grandmother asks Kate to accompany her to Redbud, Pennsylvania, to restore the grand old house she grew up in, Kate jumps at the chance.
Yet, she discovers a different kind of project upon meeting the man hired to renovate the house. ;Matt Jarreau is attractive and clearly wounded -- hiding from people, from God, and from his past. Kate can't help but set her stubborn heart on bringing him out of the dark and back into the light... whether he likes it or not.
Posted by
Amy
at
7:38 PM
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Class of 2k12 Interview with J. Anderson Coats, Author of The Wicked and the Just
Throughout the year I'll be bringing you some interviews with the authors over at the Class of 2K12! I hope you will enjoy getting to know these authors and thoughts on their books better. Today I'm bringing you an interview with J. Anderson Coats. Her book, The Wicked and the Just, is out now!
Do you share any similarities with your characters?
Of course! I don’t think writers can keep themselves completely separate from their characters, no matter how hard they try. Cecily has my bullheaded conviction of the way things ought to be, and Gwenhwyfar has my simmering rage at the many unfairnesses the world dumps on our doorsteps.
That said, I’m not nearly as bold as either of my protagonists. I don’t have Cecily’s overwhelming hubris (although it was fun to write)and I don’t have Gwenhwyfar’s singleminded ferocity. I can only dream of having Gruffydd’s pragmatism, and I’m quite a bit brighter than Emmaline de Coucy. But even my secondary characters share parts of me, because human beings are complicated creatures and we go through phases and have experiences that shape us. It’s those feelings we draw on when we create characters, not necessarily the traits themselves.
Why do you write for young people?
Young people are smart. They’re exacting and merciless, and they know what sucks and what doesn’t. I admire that. It’s a raw honestly a lot of adults don’t have the stomach for.
But kids and teens also get fed a lot of bullcrap. Some of it they know is bullcrap, and some of it they have to learn is bullcrap. One
of the ways they unlearn bullcrap is through books. I had the good fortune of reading a cubic ton of pages as a young person, and I learned a lot about life that way.
I learned that the world was bigger than my hometown.
I learned that kids could solve problems without adults.
I learned that kids could be powerful.
Now I have a chance to contribute to that body of literature, and I hope I can live up to those who came before me.
If you had to describe your book in one word what would it be?
Complex.
THE WICKED AND THE JUST is set in the past, and people see the “historical fiction” label and get a picture in their mind of what it must be about. It’s one of the tricky things about genre – it can nudge people toward or away from a certain book based on a single phrase.
It’s my hope that people are willing to look beyond genre and read “an awesome story set the past” even they ordinarily don’t like “historical fiction.” I like this question because it lets me take THE WICKED AND THE JUST out of its little box and distill it down to its essence.
What was your reading life like as a child?
I can’t remember not knowing how to read. No one taught me; I just learned. My mother read to me every single night until I was twelve. I can remember going to the library once a week – every Saturday - and checking out stacks of books so tall I needed help getting them to the
car.
My goal at age ten or so was to read every book in the world. Even the crappy ones. I had a pretty good start on the books at the library down the street from my house. Then my mom took me to the library where she worked and I stood there speechless at the sight of shelves floor to ceiling spreading out of sight, up two floors and down another two.
My first thought was Aw hell, I’m never gonna read every book in the world.
My second was I’m sure gonna love trying.
What’s the last book you read?
Fiction: The Revenant by Sonia Gensler. Winnie was a complicated, believable heroine and the setting – the Cherokee Female Seminary –
was an intriguing and memorable backdrop. The ending was wonderfully satisfying. I’m looking forward to her next book!
Nonfiction: The Governance of Gwynedd by David Stephenson. Not that this is spoilery in any way for my next book. But I would read the phone book if David Stephenson’s name was on the cover. If I ever meet him, I will squeal like a fangirl.
Reread: De Nugis Curialium by Walter Map.
As you may be able to tell, yes, I am a massive geek.
What’s your biggest guilty pleasure food?
Bacon.
There are very few things bacon cannot enhance. Bacon is good in a salad. It’s good on a sandwich. It can even coexist with a maple bar.
I would not put bacon in my coffee, though. I don’t think some sort of distilled spirit involving bacon would be good. So bacon is not the alpha and omega.
But it’s awfully darn close.
What are you working on next?
I’m working on several projects right now. One is a companion novel to The Wicked and the Just which follows Maredydd ap Madog, whose father is the ringleader of the rebellion of 1294, as he negotiates the future his father wants for him and the future he wants for himself. Another project is a standalone novel set in twelfth-century Wales which follows Angharad, a girl who wants nothing more than to get married and have her own hall and children. Trouble is, she’s been widowed twice before age seventeen. Now everyone thinks she’s cursed – especially Angharad herself.
You can learn more about J. Anderson Coats at her website. The Wicked and the Just is available now!
About The Wicked and the Just: 1293. North Wales. Ten years into English rule.
Cecily would give anything to leave Caernarvon and go home. Gwenhwyfar would give anything to see all the English leave.
Neither one is going to get her wish.
Behind the city walls, English burgesses govern with impunity. Outside the walls, the Welsh are confined by custom and bear the burden of taxation, and the burgesses plan to keep it that way.
Cecily can’t be bothered with boring things like the steep new tax or the military draft that requires Welshmen to serve in the king’s army overseas. She has her hands full trying to fit in with the town’s privileged elite, and they don’t want company.
Gwenhwyfar can’t avoid these things. She counts herself lucky to get through one more day, and service in Cecily’s house is just salt in the wound.
But the Welsh are not as conquered as they seem, and the suffering in the countryside is rapidly turning to discontent. The murmurs of revolt may be Gwenhwyfar’s only hope for survival – and the last thing Cecily ever hears
Posted by
Amy
at
10:15 AM
Labels: Author Interview, Class of 2k12
Saturday, May 12, 2012
Weekend Random: More Thoughts on The Selection, TVD, TV, and Film
As it turns out, I have more thoughts on The Selection that were brought on by Emily's very innocent comment, "But, anyway, I thought Maxon was boring, Aspen was a whiner." I completely misread that as, "Aspen was a winner" and it made me think about the roles both boys play in America's life and how class influences that. (if you read my response to Emily's comment it's kind of embarrassing how I misread that but whatever)
First of all, I should disclaim that this is not something I think/know a lot about or critique a lot in stories or anything. My interest this year, though, in the idea of how class influences character motivation and story has grown because I read The Talented Mr. Ripley as inspiration for a story line on a TV show, rewatched Vicky's story on The Vampire Diaries and read the book Irises by Francisco X. Stork. All of these things in fairly quick succession made me think about this in a way perhaps I hadn't really before...more sympathetically. And so somehow Emily's comment made me rethink my initial reactions to Maxon and Aspen and their treatment of America. What I'm about to say is fairly spoilery so skip if you like!
Aspen is in a caste lower than America's which creates the conflict in their relationship. America is pretty sure that she wants to marry Aspen, but marrying him means she has to move down in caste, something her family wouldn't appreciate at all. When America is given the chance to earn extra money, she splurges on a huge meal for Aspen and he reacts badly. He doesn't like her providing for him, and feels embarrassed by it and breaks up with her. This immediately put me off Aspen, since America was obviously acting in love and also because the idea of the girl not being able to be the provider is off putting. I mean, to be honest, I can cut Aspen a little slack for feeling that way since the society they are living in seems as if it would support the idea of the man being the main provider. But it was his treatment of America as a result of these feelings that was a turn off.
So I was all ready for her to fall for Maxon who obviously fancied her straight away and always wants to listen to her and know what she thinks. And when she makes some good points about hunger in their country, he actually takes a personal political risk to address the issue. Additionally, he's willing to have her stay for as long as he can to give her reprieve from her home life even though it has to be somewhat painful for him...he wants to marry her.
So in short, to me, Maxon comes off far and away as the better choice (you know if she likes both guys, obviously she can't force herself to love anyone). But I was thinking about it and the thing is that Maxon has an advantage already in the situation, he's in a position of complete power. He's the prince for crying out loud! And I'm not sure that he should really get points for basically being a decent human being in the sense that just because he could expel her and doesn't that somehow makes him better? While emotionally he isn't the one in control, in all other regards he is, he could send her home if he wanted to or even force her to marry him if he wanted to. While Aspen has absolutely no control in his life, he's in a lower caste, would be asking America to make a huge sacrifice to marry him, etc. It doesn't change the way I feel about either character, but it did make me think about how this is presented in fiction...I was immediately turned off of Aspen for his reaction to America buying him food, but I can never know how Maxon would have reacted in the same situation. Maxon, the guy from the upper class, immediately becomes more attractive even though everything in his life gives him the advantage of being the better guy. I don't know if I'm making sense, but it was interesting for me to think about.
Can you think of any other examples where this happens?
The CW Will Die Soon
In other news, the CW didn't order The Selection TV show and I was actually really disappointed! I think part of reading less books is spending more time thinking about some of the ones you do read and the more I thought about this as a TV show the more I thought it could really work. And then Jace Lacob actually called it one of the 13 best drama pilot scripts and his description of the pilot made it sound like it would be a pretty great show. So it's disappointing. But it's also making me wonder what in the world the CW is doing. The last real hit they had was The Vampire Diaries and I don't understand why they aren't following the formula that made that work. And I don't mean love triangles, I mean capitalizing on something that is popular in culture and giving it a fresh spin. Part of why The Vampire Diaries worked was because it was a vampire show for teens and there was nothing else like it on air. And vampires were popular! Last year they had a zombie show in the works that they didn't pick up, but have you seen the ratings for The Walking Dead? And also zombies are/were pretty popular. Now they had a show that taps into the popularity of dystopian works without being The Hunger Games at all, and they pass on it. It wouldn't be so bad except that the shows they did order all sound terrible. They all sound like tired, recycled ideas that will fail. Well Arrow might do okay, but I don't care to watch it. I do understand that there are things I don't understand like contracts and money, professional back scratching etc that go on, it's just kind of a bummer for me because I like shows that aren't procedurals and they are so hard to find. It's sad to see The CW veer in that direction as well. BUT in happy making news they renewed Nikita!!!! It's on Netflix, please watch it and catch up, I need some friends to talk about it with!
A few more TVD thoughts
The post-finale interviews have been really off-putting to me. Mostly in regards to the Klaus in Tyler's body while being in love with Caroline stuff. The fact that Klaus was in Tyler's body in the final goodbye scene is kind of gross to me, since he was all kissing her and stuff, but mostly it's just sad that the scene wasn't "real." The only thing is that it makes sense why "Tyler" wanted her to leave and turned into a wolf to scare her away...it's because he wasn't going to be dying and needed her not to know that. I'm guessing Klaus chose to possess Tyler because Tyler is a hybrid like he was. But ugh if he sleeps with Caroline next season, I don't know. It's not so much the story itself as the fact that the people writing it think it's fun that gives me serious pause as to why I'm still watching.
But also I was reading part of an interview where Julie Plec was talking about what a great character Klaus is, and how lucky they were to have such a great character come into the show etc, etc. and this has to be a case where she's too close to the material or the actor or something because the show has really suffered creatively from the injection of Klaus and the twist to keep him alive is a huge burden on it as well. And the way she's talking about the originals being around next season is terrible! We don't need them! And the weird thing is I thought the story line had a lot of potential, but if you look at the season as a whole, it was mostly all about giving us the necessary history to establish the dramatics of the last few episodes. TERRIBLE. (I was thinking about how Klaus said Elena would be safest with Matt and not Stefan or Damon and it turned out that she died with Matt. It was all there in the season all along)
A few GG Thoughts
I wrote at length about the character of Serena and how I saw her arc earlier this year so it's been interesting to see how it has all come to fruition. I have to admit it's much sadder than I had hoped for. But even so I liked how in this past episode Serena was helpful to both Blair and Dan and their relationship together. It was actually a really high moment for her because she was important and helpful to her two closest friends. That made it all the more heartbreaking to see her past actions come back to hurt her at the end of the episode. And watching the preview...well while she was helpful to them in 5x23, I think she'll be trying to tear them apart in the finale. It's a sad story line, but still one I can understand. I'm curious to see how it wraps up. And yes I'm still watching despite how terrible it is, this show has some interesting stuff going on in it that I can't seem to let go of.
Film
A couple of weeks ago I watched Love is a Many Splendored Thing. It was one of those movies on Netflix, I just sort of put on and I was surprised by how much I enjoyed it. Part of it is because I spent a weekend in Hong Kong and it's not something I think about a lot so it's fun to see a story set there. It really is an interesting place. And it was interesting that the film engaged ideas about race and interracial relationships and affairs and all of that stuff. It made me really want to read the book it's based on as I'm sure the book digs much deeper into these ideas. (it's a book based on fact) BUT!!! It is so weird to me that while the film is engaging these ideas in a way that seems progressive and positive and interesting in the narrative text, what's onscreen contradicts it all because the actress playing the heroine, who is supposed to be both Chinese and English, is played by a white actress with some make-up to give her an Asian look. Apparently, it would be too off putting to audiences to see the actor kiss an Asian girl. THIS IS SO BIZARRE TO ME. How can you tell a story like this without really telling it?
I also saw The Avengers on my birthday. I liked it well enough for a superhero action flick, but to be honest, that's all it was. It has some good humor and fun moments.
This is all a good excuse for me to remind you that Film Club is discussing Whip It this month. Please join in!! Our discussion will be on the 31st.
Reader Survey
Thanks to everyone who filled out my reader survey! Just in case you missed it, here's the link. I'd still love your feedback. It has already inspired me in the posts I've written since I put it up. :)
Happy Mother's Day!

Posted by
Amy
at
6:19 PM
Labels: Film, Gossip Girl, Love Triangles, The Vampire Diaries










